ABSTRACT
Background. Data regarding respiratory pathogen epidemiology in the tropical country of Ecuador are limited. Here, we describe the temporal patterns and etiologies of medically attended acute respiratory infections among Ecuadorean children during the 20-month period preceding the onset of the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods. Children < 5 years old presenting to a designated outpatient clinic with at least 2 new symptoms consistent with an acute respiratory infection are eligible for enrollment. Informed consent is obtained. Demographic and clinical details are collected. A nasopharyngeal sample is collected for diagnostic testing of 22 target pathogen groups using Biofire's Respiratory Panel v1.7 multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay. Results. Of the 820 subjects enrolled between July 15, 2018 and March 15, 2020, 655 (80%) tested positive for at least one pathogen. The detection of pathogens was more likely from samples collected from children enrolled in Quito (85%) compared to Machala (76%) (p < 0.05). The most frequently detected pathogen groups were rhinovirus/ enterovirus (46%), parainfluenza virus (14%), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (12%), and influenza virus (10%). Two or more pathogen groups were codetected in 174 (27%) of the respiratory samples. Pathogen specific seasonal patterns were not observed for rhinovirus/enterovirus, adenovirus, or atypical bacteria at either site. Samples collected in Quito were positive for the detection of RSV spanning a 32-week period between November and June. In contrast, detection of RSV from samples collected in Machala spanned only a 17- week period between February and May. In Quito, influenza viruses were detected between August and February, with influenza A activity preceding that of influenza B. In Machala, the detection of influenza B virus coincided with the dry season, while detection of influenza A virus was clustered in the rainy period between January and March. Conclusion. The specific etiologies and seasonality of acute respiratory tract infections among Ecuadorean children < 5 years of age differ by site of enrollment. Such differences in regional data can be used to optimize regional implementation of existing and soon-to-be available public health prevention measures.
ABSTRACT
Background. Vaccine attitudes of healthcare providers (HCPs) influence patient vaccine acceptance. We sought to characterize vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among HCPs in NYS. Methods. An electronic survey was developed to assess vaccine KAP among HCPs. The questionnaires were sent to members of various national medical organizations via local chapter administrators. Results. 864 surveys were returned from 672 (78%) physicians and 192 (22%) mid-level practitioners (MLPs). 624/724 (86%) of HCPs report always recommending routine vaccines to eligible patients, yet only 76% recommend influenza vaccine (IV) and 77% strongly recommend HPV vaccine at 11-12 yrs. MLPs had a higher mean agreement level that recommending vaccines (4.6 vs 4.2 p < 0.01) or promoting HPV vaccine (4.2 vs. 3.9 p < 0.05) is within their scope of practice. Physicians had a higher mean agreement level that: vaccine benefits outweigh risks (4.9 vs 4.6 p < 0.01), HPV vaccine prevents cancer (4.7 vs 4.5 p < 0.01), and COVID-19 vaccine is safe (4.8 vs 4.5 p < 0.01) and effective (4.8 vs 4.7 p < 0.01). 82% (680/825) of HCPs knew that vaccines should not be deferred for mild illness. 14/836 (2%) believed that HPV vaccine could increase sexual activity, while 273/705 (39%) knew that the most common HPV associated malignancy is oropharyngeal cancer. HCPs who correctly answered >= 5/7 questions (462/507 91%) were more likely to recommend all vaccines to eligible patients than HCPs with lower scores (22/40 50% p < 0.05). Routine IV recommendation was more likely among HCPs who: strongly disagree that influenza is not serious enough for vaccination (292/397 (74%) vs 137/249 (55%) p < 0.01), strongly agree that it prevents severe disease (267/352 (76%) vs 162/294 (55%) p < 0.01), and receive annual IV (423/629 (67%) vs 6/17 (35%)) p < 0.01). HPV vaccine recommendation at 11-12 years was more likely among HCPs who strongly agree that the vaccine prevents cancer (273/326 (84%) vs 48/86, 56% p < 0.01) and those who stated that vaccination does not increase risk of unprotected sex (316/392 (79%) vs 3/12 (25%) p < 0.01). Conclusion. Vaccine recommendation practices are influenced by HCP vaccine misperceptions and hesitancy. Interventions to reduce misperceptions and improve vaccine confidence are needed.